1 of 7Start
Tax Cuts Hidden in Tax Reform
President Trump and Congressional Republican leaders Senator Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan are working on the second major legislative push of the administration—tax reform. They’re promising massive cuts, and using language about making taxes “simpler, fairer, and lower” that’s designed to appeal to a broad swath of Americans.
Though the Trump-McConnell-Ryan tax cuts are truly massive—they’d cost $2.4 trillion over the next ten years—they aren’t designed to help all Americans equally. Very wealthy Americans can expect a major windfall, which will amount to an average cost of $1,370 for every household in the bottom 99 percent.
Here’s how some of the biggest cuts would work.
2 of 7
Cut the corporate tax rate
Donald Trump and congressional Republican leaders want to reduce the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent, which the Tax Policy Center estimates would cost a staggering $2 trillion over 10 years (that’s about three times what the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, would cost over the same time period).
The standard justification for these cuts is that they’ll boost business and create jobs. During the 2016 Presidential debates, Trump vowed the cut would “be a job creator like we haven’t seen since Ronald Reagan.” The catch is, U.S. corporations’ tax burden is already comparatively lower than our major trading partners, and U.S. multinationals take advantage of so many loopholes that their effective tax rates are nearly half the statutory rate. Corporations as a whole are actually contributing less to total taxes than they did in the early 1950s: Their share of total tax revenues has dropped from 33 percent down to roughly 10 percent of total revenues.
3 of 7
Eliminate the tax on corporations’ overseas profits
Right now, U.S. corporations pay the U.S. corporate income tax on both domestic and foreign profits, but they can put off paying the tax on their foreign profits by keeping them offshore. This also gives them the incentive to shift profits they earn in the United States offshore. Trump and congressional GOP leaders have proposed moving to a territorial tax system, which would eliminate the tax on foreign profits altogether. That way, U.S. corporations would only owe taxes on profits made in the United States and no tax at all on their foreign profits. And the incentive to shift domestic profits offshore would be even greater.
Absent strong measures to prevent multinationals from shifting profits (and possibly jobs) offshore, a territorial corporate tax would create new tax loopholes that could be used for this purpose. Anti-profit shifting provisions are notoriously difficult to develop and enforce.
4 of 7
Cut the tax rate paid by high-income business owners
Businesses that are structured as S corporations, partnerships, LLCs, and sole proprietorships do not pay the corporate income tax at all. Instead, their owners pay taxes on their share of the business’s income at regular individual income tax rates, which range from 10 percent to 39.6 percent.
Trump and GOP congressional leaders have proposed capping the tax rate on pass-through business profits that individuals receive at 25 percent. Since that would significantly lower the tax rate for business owners who are currently in higher tax brackets, this proposal would cost $769 billion over the next decade.
Trump and the congressional GOP claim this tax cut is for “small” businesses, but most actual small businesses won’t benefit much, if at all, from this change. Over 86 percent of pass-through businesses already fall in the 25 percent tax bracket or lower, and over 50 percent currently fall in the 15 percent bracket or lower. The people who will benefit from the change are very wealthy business owners—such as hedge fund managers, lobbying and law firms, real estate financiers, and big businesses that are organized as pass-throughs but compete with large corporations.
This proposal would also likely create a new avenue for wealthy individuals to avoid taxes by re-characterizing their high salary as business income that would qualify for the lower rate. This can be accomplished, for example, by creating an LLC to receive their salary, then paying the preferential tax rate on the “profits” they receive from the LLC.
5 of 7
Collapse the individual tax rates from seven to three
Proponents of the new tax plan have made a lot of noise about simplifying the tax code for working Americans by reducing the number of tax brackets. The Trump-McConnell-Ryan tax plan calls for individual income tax rates of 12, 25, and 35 percent.
Depending upon where the rates kick in, there may or may not be any benefit for those who currently fall in the 25 percent tax bracket or lower. In fact, some low- and middle-income people may pay more tax than under current law, since other “simplifying” proposals include eliminating personal and dependent exemptions, the additional standard deduction for seniors and the blind, the deduction for high medical expenses, and the state and local tax deduction. Altogether, the Trump-McConnell-Ryan tax plan will cost middle class taxpayers an increase in taxes of $470 billion over 10 years.
Millionaires, on the other hand, would benefit in two ways from the collapse in rates. The top rate, which currently applies to all income above roughly $400,000, would be cut from 39.6 down to 35 percent. For someone with $1 million in taxable income, this could be a tax cut of $26,000. They would also get a secondary benefit from the lower rates on portions of their income that fall in the (newly reduced) lower-rate brackets.
6 of 7
Repeal the tax on estates worth more than $5.5 million
Repealing the estate tax is a perennial GOP proposal. The estate tax is a progressive tax that only applies to the super wealthy: estates worth more than $5.49 million for an individual or nearly $11 million for a couple. Of the millions of people who die each year in the United States, less than 0.2 percent of estates are subject to any estate tax at all.
Since the gain in value of stock, art, real estate, and other capital assets is not taxed unless the assets are sold, the estate tax is designed to ensure that wealthy people pay at least some tax on assets they’ve held onto before those assets are passed down to their lucky heirs. Repealing the estate tax is not about making the tax code simpler or fairer. It’s about enabling millionaires and billionaires to pass valuable assets to their heirs tax-free.
7 of 7
What real tax reform would look like
There are many ways the tax code could be improved to increase fairness and reduce complexity, while still providing adequate revenue to fund investments in education, housing, and transportation. These tax code improvements include eliminating loopholes that reward multinational corporations that offshore profits; ending special subsidies for oil and gas companies; treating income from wealth and work more equitably so that everyone pays their fair share of the cost of government; strengthening tax credits for working families so that those who need them the most can have access; and addressing tax accounting complexity faced by truly small businesses. These steps would constitute real reform.
Instead, the GOP is clinging to the premise that tax cuts will spur huge economic growth that will somehow trickle down to average American workers. History tells us they won’t. It also tells us that tax cuts of this size will lead to budget-busting revenue losses—and that could threaten funding for Medicare, Medicaid, education, and many other foundations of an economy that works for everyone.
So let’s stop calling this plan “reform” and call it what it is. It’s tax cuts. Trillions of dollars’ worth of them for the wealthy and corporations.